maybe, but by "f**cking" with the whole "chain of command" (musically
speaking) bypassing the whole licensing thing, dirk & others like him open
up the door for some really ugly situations.
and in light of the mp3 fiasco and mixedtapes crackdown, i'm honestly
surprised to hear and see sony & bmg, like you said, "biting the hand that
feeds them" namely independent artists and labels.
he eventually might not have a job, just based on the situation he's
created.
food for thought.
sand.
From: Bailey Paul P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Sanderson Dear'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: "'313 list'" <313@hyperreal.org>
Subject: RE: (313) what's with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 14:40:09 -0000
I dont know, I guess the guy might like to keep putting food on the table
and retain his job.
you dont bite the hand that feeds you...
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Sanderson Dear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 February 2000 14:04
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) what's with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what is with the people at sony (ger.), they seem to think they're free and
clear of any liability in this whole UR thing. at least that's the
impression i get after firing off an email to the man responsible for this
whole fiasco.
has anyone else got the same smugness?
curious.
sand.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
