So far the votes are Cubase: 3 (or maybe 4) cakewalk: 2 and logic: 0. My
quesiton is:Why?
Is cubase that much easier to use than logic? I've heard Logic is quite a
bitch. I'll say this much, I thought Acid was pretty much a toy, not that
I'm bragging about my abilities, rather speaking to Acid's ease of use (and
inherent limitations). I knew Acid in and out within a two days of
installing it. It's just that I've hit a "wall" as far as what I want to do
with my computer and in order to climb over that wall i need to move on to a
more powerful chunk o' software.
I swore by Cakewalk for sequencing midi till I got the MPC2000, since than
computers have left my studio.
Funny you might say that, I swore by an MPC 2000 until I started using my
PC, it just seems so much more intuitive, plus I hated staring at that
miniscule display for hours on end.
But for audio I think Cubase is better (don't know
about Logic).
Jernej
Christian Bloch wrote:
> that's a question of religious proportions, there's no true answer... i
> believe in cubase by the way
>
> christian bloch
> tresor/LL/simple muzik/funque droppings/junk food
> mp3.com/bloch mp3.com/bscb mp3.com/waterlog
>
> On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Hugh G. Blaze wrote:
>
> > I want to sequence wave files (ala sonic foundry's ACID) and midi data
at
> > the same time, what software is best suited to the task - cubase, or
logic?
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
