Yeah actually I don't mind side B, although I'm not absolutely mad about it. It's quirkier. And I feel it might grow one me. I feel I already have absorbed all the juice out of side A and I've only heard it about 3 times.
I tend to think that the headline track is the A side though, so that's what I was levelling my ire at. Do *you* wanna fight Greg? ;-) Ken -----Original Message----- From: Greg Earle [mailto:ea...@isolar.dyndns.org] Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 8:35 PM To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) DEMF prediction On May 24, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Frank Glazer <cpe1704...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree with you Ken to an extent, but like you said, nobody claimed > that it was good, just that it could be big at DEMF this year. > Honestly, though, even though i know it's simplistic soulless crap, I > actually enjoy it quite a bit despite myself. > > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Odeluga, Ken <ken.odel...@dowjones.com> > wrote: >> I bought an online copy of that track. >> >> I don't know what the fuss is all about. >> >> To me it seems just like an old fashioned, run-of-the-mill [and off the >> conveyor belt] 'minimal' thing. >> >> It's got interesting effects but the sounds are flat, cold and tinny, >> and the whole thing is s quite soul-less and meaningless, even in our world >> of dance music, in which the 'meaning' of music is opaque [at best]. If no one else will claim it's good I will! It's a perfect summation of The Knife gone Techno, I think it's absolutely beautiful and where you could get "run-of-the-mill 'minimal'" out of it Ken, I don't know ... did you forget to listen to side B? ;) OAR003-B reminds me of a warm sunny day, you know, kinda like what you've had in London today :) - Greg