There are a ton of horror stories about touring with analog synths in
the old days -- bringing two of everything and a synth tech just to
have one machine working every night, or using space heaters on stage
next to synths to keep them at a constant temperature so they stay in
tune.  Or Keith Emerson bringing along a 5 panel Moog Modular, which
would of course have to be repatched and tweaked every night to get it
in the neighborhood of the patch used in his songs.

Ironically, the variability and unpredictability of analog is one of
its prized attributes these days, and in the digital emulations, they
go to the trouble of programming in 'analog variability.'

I attended a group discussion with Tim Hecker a couple weeks ago and
he said some interesting things about the performance aspect of modern
electronic music, and he said he thought that playback only
performances were just fine, if the quality of the music and
presentation was sufficiently involving.  I tend to agree with him.
Having played in orchestras, and seen plenty of rock bands perform, I
think that the idea of the live performance is way overrated.  What
happens a lot of the time is that a band is rehearsed to the point
where they are mostly a rote playback machine, not appreciably more
'creative' than a computer sequencer.  And the point at which I become
dissatisfied with a band performance is when they 'jam it out' --
unless they're superlative improvisors, I'd much rather they stick to
the script.

I make an exception in judging performances whose foreground attribute
is improvisation.  That is an art unto itself. Paradoxically the best
improvisational performances I've seen actually were the result of
hundreds of hours of rehearsal, for the ensemble to reach the point
where they could 'freely improvise' without things turning into a
dog's breakfast.

The rest -- the guitarist making faces, the singer cutting figures,
the prancing around -- is just entertainment. What you're there for is
a shared experience in an environment larger than your living room or
your headphones.  You have a right to expect an interesting and
satisfying experience, not any particular standard of stagecraft,
unless the stagecraft is the standard by which you judge a
performance.

In the particular case of Kraftwerk -- and this goes for techno in
general -- the means of production happen so far out of real time that
to ask them to 'play' their songs for you becomes an absurd request.
It might be possible for them to 'learn' the productions as realized
on tape, but it's silly to ask a human being to duplicate the
precision of a digital sequencer.  And I've been dissatisfied with the
work of performers like Richie Hawtin who go to great lengths to put
together a high-tech performance system they can 'play' because often
the result isn't as interesting as it was to be at events where he
'just' played records.  Your mileage may vary.

Reply via email to