i agree, a crossfader is good for tricks but channel faders are very
accurate while mixing two or three records. of course tweaking the eq is the
other essential element. (a good ear and solid beat matching help provide
the smoothness of the mix too).
djr
From: "darw_n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [313] dodgy mixing
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 16:51:57 -0800
wait, are we talking about using levels vs. cross faders?
If so, I would strongly disagree, using the levels is far more precise, and
what to do if using three tables?
I find cross faders to be way inaccurate...
darw_n
"create, demonstrate, toneshift..."
search for "djdarwin" on napster
www.sphereproductions.com
www.mannequinodd.com
www.mp3.com/darw_n
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 5:52 AM
Subject: Re: [313] dodgy mixing
>
>
> I never quite got that, mixing with the faders... its slow and
inaccurate..
> specially those dateq tables...u need a bike to mix in a tune...
> crossfading is the essence of a sparkling mix!
>
>
> 154
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
