yeah you were there the first night (didn't hear me though), but it's a totally different location now (basement), there's a much better sound system and some quality djs... i am not forgetting otto's other point, i have no problem with constructive criticism, i just don't like the destructive criticism solely for the sake of stirring up discussion... because people take criticism to heart, you should make it constructive and not just put forth destructive criticism for the sake of argument... if you want an opinion of the music that night - everybody was blasting, in particular i liked derek plaslaiko the best - but what stole everybody's attention was the positive atmosphere there. funny by the way how nobody who was actually there has put forth any harsh criticism.... see you next time? _________ christian bloch http://mp3.com/bloch ____--
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jayson B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 7:14 AM Subject: Re: [313] Negativity (Was: Re: [313] 2030????) > > >and that's excactly the point... there's a big difference between > >constructive and destructive criticism. and the people who so readily >puts > >forth the criticism haven't even been there. > > > > *ahem* I was there the first night you played. Not to mention going to > small shindigs there over two years ago. But you forgot that otto made > another point: if people are allowed positive comments on a subject, then > negative comments are just as valid. Personally? whenever writes something > negative about me, or my music, i take it to heart. No matter how flaming > the response is, there's some truth to it (except mr. burns' "you faggot ass > techno poser" post. that was worthless). but i'm generally open minded and > empathetic. > > > for people who are *so* all about the music, I saw ONE review of the music > on that night. ONE REVIEW. I hope this sheds some light as to why my post > was so negative. People talk their game about the importance and elevation > of their music, but when the night came the situation and the enviroment > certainly appeared more important. (thank to g for bringing this point up). > > > Anyways, in person my arguements appear more constructive, although not any > less harsh. > > > *sigh* so who's going to the next jak? > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ---------------------------------------------------- NetZero Platinum Sign Up Today - Only $9.95 per month! http://my.netzero.net/s/signup?r=platinum&refcd=PT97 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
