put emphasis on the music, and the person who make, by asking this racial
questions u only make the racial problem. if u think about the persons who
make the music as REAL live person and not as black or white but as human,
things will be better. you might say i am just one little person and racial
problem is a fact- well if u want a change do the change. and those try to
demolish all this racial stuff from the discourse.
i know what i am saying i am jewish.
y.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phonopsia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: [313] Black techno artists]


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "armin holzgethan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <313@hyperreal.org>
> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 7:51 AM
> Subject: Re: [313] Black techno artists]
>
> > i still don't get it.
> >
> > what are you aiming at? how & where should this recognition express
> itself? on
> > mtv, usa today? how many people know stephen king? and how many know
> malcolm
> > lowry?
>
> I'm aiming at recognition in the electronic music underground. How to
> quantify recognition? Sure it's oblique... How about references in
histories
> of house (AV and textual) for one. Prolly a lame definition, but you get
> what I'm on about.
>
> > all those you mention are more or less known to people into this music.
> some
> > will reach a certain status as "innovators", some will be forgotten.
some
> will
> > blow up by accident because the time is right and/or because they work
> towards
> > it. maybe this has sometimes to do with the quality and the aim of their
> work
> > too? to blame it all on the circumstances seems to me as banal as the
> opposite,
> > which is to blame it all on the lack of marketing skills.
>
> I don't think that's the whole cup of tea. There's a mythos attached to
the
> term "Chicago House DJ" that is not parallel to "Detroit House DJ" in the
> mind of the average club-goer who is somewhat in-the-know. For instance,
> "Chicago's Gene Farris" immediately has a credibility to the average house
> club-goer that "Detroit's Terrence Parker" does not. To see this in
effect,
> look at a poster for Gene Farris' "Booked" CD.
>
> > tp has a relatively huge fanbase in germany because of his djing. all of
> his
> > records i know of are mediocre. alan oldham's stuff lacks originality
big
> time.
> > just to be a detroiter and having started in 1988 is not enough.
>
> Yeah. TP has built a dedicated fan-base in Germany over the years, but he
is
> relatively unknown and hasn't played in Washington DC in years (if ever).
> This is a house music city and has been for over a decade. Ron Trent has
> been here (but he's known here for his work living in New York) and Alton
> Miller has played here once. At the same time, at least 10 Chicago house
DJs
> have played here, not to mention endless DJs from New York (although they
> have a geographical advantage to DJs form the midwest). In addition to
that,
> most "scenes" in the eastern U.S. "buy into" a New York version of the
> history of house/garage. Statements like "everyone knows house came from
New
> York" would not be uncommon, and generally reinforced through local
> promotions/myths/regional email lists, etc. Not only is the Chicago
history
> of house downplayed if recognized at all, the Detroit history of house is
> completely absent. You could almost flip the coin and apply all of that to
> Chicago - but not to the same degree, and again Detroit is missing from
the
> puzzle. History's are being written today, and it takes a history of house
> and techno *in Detroit* to recognize Detroit House, although the impact of
> Detroit house from the 80s was just as lasting as any other. Couldn't we
put
> the Music Institute right near the Warehouse and the Paradise Garage in
> terms of legendary clubs that defined and nurtured scenes? You can't try
to
> tell me this is even 1/10th as recognizable as either of the former in
> today's music histories.
>
> > self-esteem is not supposed to grow because of one's name in the paper
or
> a
> > certain number on one's bank statement, but because one feels that
he/she
> is
> > doing the right thing and maybe because one lifts the artform to new
> heights.
> > the name all over the paper and the big bucks in the bank are most of
the
> time
> > & and as long as this capitalist etc society stands a sign that one
> submitted &
> > adapted oneself successfully to the expectations of society. same as
good
> marks
> > at school. same as any institutional or mainstream recognition. in this
> sense
> > most of the time mainstream success can be used as a sign for
irrelevance.
>
> What I was noting with my list was people who generally don't get the same
> acclaim as their peers from the '80s in Chicago and New York in the
> histories of house - not specifically in terms of bank rolls. Detroit
house
> is something that most people into house can't even recognize.
>
> Tristan
> ----------
> http://www.mp313.com <- Music
> http://www.metrotechno.net <- DC techno + more
> http://www.metatrackstudios.com <- DC DJ/Production studios
> http://phonopsia.tripod.com <- Hub
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <- email
> <FrogboyMCI> <- AOL Instant Messenger
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to