I really enjoyed myself that night despite not having my dancing shoes on. As Brendan intimated, Juan's track selection was perhaps better than his mixing, but I'm happy just to hear "M5" or "Game One" in a set nowadays. Derrick was dynamic, if a little too tribal for my liking. Agreed about the queues, although they were nice bogs.
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 1:23 PM Subject: RE: [313] detroit in london > Derrick May was being pretty adventurous with the EQs, while Juan was > keeping things a bit more flat - I probably went for Juan's track selection > more than Derrick's (although "Fade to Grey" could have been faded out a bit > sooner I thought!), but to be honest I ended up spending a lot of time the > blue room (who was that guy who was on from the beginning up til 3am or so? > he was nice) or in the bar gawping at the lights of Docklands - I'd never > been in that venue before, so it was a bit of a novelty being indoors > listening to loud techno but still able to see the outside world... > > The queues were ridiculous, though, and some of the security staff were > borderline psychopaths! The cloakroom queue was operated on the assumption > that Lost regulars were all card-carrying members of Al-Qaeda or worse, and > one particular scrawny bloke with a ponytail actually had to be dragged away > by his boss after getting too aggressive with someone who'd basically done > nothing wrong, but what more can you expect? > > Brendan > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 15 April 2002 13:01 > > To: Langsman, Marc > > Cc: 'Nicole Slavin'; 313@hyperreal.org > > Subject: RE: [313] detroit in london > > > > > > > > Lost was O.K if you don't mind warehouse style events with > > huge queues for > > everything. I thought Juan's technical skills were terrible & > > Derrick May > > was quite good. > > (I know others that went on this list thought differently though.) > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Legal Disclaimer > > This message contains confidential information and is intended only for > the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not > disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender > immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete > this e-mail from your system. > mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as > information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or > incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept > liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message that > arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required > please request a hard-copy version. This message is provided for > informational purposes only. > our website at: http://www.widelearning.com > > Wide Learning is a trading name of Wide Multimedia Ltd Registered office: > 33-41 Dallington Street, London EC1V 0BB > Company number: 3339664 VAT number: 690 8399 83 > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
