well basically like Robert says everything can be sampled, so nothing is safe, whether they have to pay or not.. I also agree with some pionts that the Webmaster from Submerge raised. if my old work was down and out then yeah re-work it man and see how it sounds now.. like Gary Numan did with Cars ,he loved it and really did not mind that Armin and Sugar babes nicked it, maybe sometimes we all need to be that free and easy with our music.I mean lets not forget music is like history it just keep on repeating itself.
Maybe father hood is making me clam down more, lets all be free and loving people , sharing the wonders of life :) -----Original Message----- From: Jongsma, K.J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 August 2002 09:50 To: 'Ian Cheshire'; 'Williams, Howard'; 313 (E-mail) Subject: RE: [313] > can you post this to the 313 list... ? Oh please the Jaguar case was completely different! Sonny wanted to license Th Jaguar from UR, send multiple faxes to UR and UR told Sonny that they where not interested in a deal with Sonny. So Sonny just coppied the whole track and released it with a lot of references to Jaguar, they stole the complete track after they could not get the original track, Beasty Boys just sampled 6 seconds from a track, how many House and Techno artist don't sample 6 seconds and loop them i think the list is about endless.... [EMAIL PROTECTED] > this is true.. The Jaguar sample was not asked for by Sony, so > would this be classed also as a free piece of music to have? > > Robert your comments please.. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Williams, Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 August 2002 09:32 > To: 313 (E-mail) > Subject: Re: [313] > can you post this to the 313 list... ? > > > 313, > > bit late on this one - how do you guys n gals see this in > relation to the > oft maligned Jaguar rip off scenario? i've not heard the > beasties lift of > this six second sample so i can't comment on that > > do the two scenarios even begin to compare? > > in the case of Jaguar, any right minded folk should obviously > side with UR > > it appears not so clear cut with the beasties, i'm just > curious where the > line is being drawn, > > H > > Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 19:06:36 -0400 > To: "Brian 'balistic' Prince" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: David Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: "Thomas D. Cox, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 313@hyperreal.org > Subject: Re: [313] > can you post this to the 313 list... ? > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended > recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential > information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should > not be copied, > disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an > intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any > attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER De gemeente Almelo aanvaardt voor haar medewerkers geen enkele aansprakelijkheid voor eventueel onjuist, onrechtmatig of ontoelaatbaar geacht gebruik van e-mail (inclusief bijlagen). Dit e-mail bericht is door de gemeente Almelo gecontroleerd op de aanwezigheid van eventuele virussen. Wij kunnen echter geen garantie afgeven dat al onze e-mail berichten volledig virus vrij zijn. Het is daarom verstandig uw binnenkomende e-mail berichten zelf op de mogelijke aanwezigheid van virussen te controleren. -------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
