possibly, but fatboy slim sucks ab
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "spw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 2:32 AM Subject: Re: (313) production and mastering > > > I read somewhere Fatboy Slim still uses (or at least did on his first > album) Notator on an Atari ST. > > G. > > > > > spw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/02/2003 15:10:55 > > To: > cc: <313@hyperreal.org> > > Subject: Re: (313) production and mastering > > > In a couple of years I probably still be using old software on > a Mac. > Digital audio is digital audio regardless of what platform your > using and if you have the latest computer model/ operating > system. > All you really need is a decent sound card, a good sound > source, and most importantly good production skills. > > on 2/6/03 9:01 AM, Jongsma, K.J. at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Protools 6 runs fine on OSX and so does Logic 5.x, Cubase SX, Reason 2.0 > > etc. we just have to wait for people like Native Instruments to convert > the > > VST apps to Audio Units and then i am really happy :) > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >> Yee haa! I'd love run a Unix based music system - there's a > >> great article in > >> Sound on Sound this month (you've probably seen it), about > >> Linux for music. > >> Somehow I think there's something inherently techno-y about > >> using Unix to do > >> music!! Call it the geek quotient...;-) > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "House of Suki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: "Sakari Karipuro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313" > >> <313@hyperreal.org> > >> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 2:48 PM > >> Subject: RE: (313) production and mastering > >> > >> > >>> The protools that comes with the digi001 (not the free one) > >> supports XP > >> (and > >>> better yet, digi released WDM drivers so you can use any > >> windows prog with > >>> the hardware) and PT 6 will also run on XP. I am not a big fan of > >> protools > >>> since the midi support still seems a little awkward > >> (compared to logic or > >>> cubase anyway) but I cannot really talk smack about their > >> hardware which > >> is > >>> the best by a long shot. However, I think in a couple years > >> the idea of > >>> using protools as a "Techno" production platform will not > >> even come into > >>> play since PCs are outpacing Macs both in price and > >> performance and the > >>> improvements in affordable sound interfaces will soon make the $50k, > >>> $300/hour studio obsolete for dance music producers. Once > >> Windows is > >> taken > >>> out of the picture and companies get a little initiative > >> (how about a > >> custom > >>> Linux distro for Cubase ala final scratch?) we will see the > >> true advent of > >>> the home studio. > >>> > >>> -raph > >>> > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Sakari Karipuro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 8:30 AM > >>> To: 313 > >>> Subject: Re: (313) production and mastering > >>> > >>> > >>> spw wrote on Thu, 6 Feb 2003 about following: > >>> > >>>> No offence, but it sounds like you have never used Pro Tools. > >>>> There is the free version at digidesign's web site if you > >> want to become > >>>> more familiarized with the software. http://www.digidesign.com/ > >>> > >>> seems that it still is win98/me only on windows platform, > >> and i'm sure > >>> pretty much nobody uses win98/me anymore. > >>> > >>> yes, i've tried it in win2k + xp, and it doesn't work. i don't > >>> actually need it for anything, but i would have wanted to try. > >>> > >>> sakke > >>> -- > >>> - * remixes out now * - > >>> http://www.arabuusimiehet.com/sakke/music.html > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > DISCLAIMER > > > > De gemeente Almelo aanvaardt voor haar medewerkers geen enkele > > aansprakelijkheid voor eventueel onjuist, onrechtmatig of > > ontoelaatbaar geacht gebruik van e-mail (inclusief bijlagen). > > > > Dit e-mail bericht is door de gemeente Almelo gecontroleerd op > > de aanwezigheid van eventuele virussen. Wij kunnen echter geen > > garantie afgeven dat al onze e-mail berichten volledig virus > > vrij zijn. Het is daarom verstandig uw binnenkomende e-mail > > berichten zelf op de mogelijke aanwezigheid van virussen > > te controleren. > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >
