ok so hi we should end this and talk about something else.
what about the new hawtin and vath album? I never heard anyone talk about it anyone wanna have a party? -Joe ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "James Bucknell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313 Mailing List" <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:29 AM Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations > Well, maybe there is an interesting point here. Do tracks just stand alone, > without any context in time? I personally like to know when a track was > done, it gives me an idea of how the artist was affected by the scene > surrounding them, and the influences that are at play. > > I have tracks that are wicked for the time, but now sound a a little dated. > They still retain some of their original power, but now can be seen as > important advances for their respective times. Maybe the dispute arose over > listing years that are quite recent? Seeing tracklistings with (2001), > (2000), or (1998) in them might look overly anal, but still I like to trace > an artist's development, so for me it's important information. > > Just my tuppence, > > Andrew > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "James Bucknell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313 > Mailing List" <313@hyperreal.org> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:16 PM > Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations > > > > Now we are going to argue about putting years of tracks on tracklists, or > > not - I had thought I'd seen the further limits of triviality on this > list, > > till now!! > > > > ¦-D > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: James Bucknell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 4:12 AM > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313 Mailing List > > >Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations > > > > > > > > >the reason for putting the year of release in a track listing is the same > > >reason that track listings mention the artist, title, record label and > mix. > > >it's information that is useful for those that want to track it down. > > >james > > > > > > > > >> | > > >> | > > >> | > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> | > Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 07:29:39 -0500 > > >> | > To: 313@hyperreal.org > > >> | > Subject: (313) playlists and conversations > > >> | > > > >> | > For the person giving the years on his playlists, isnt that very > > >> | > fuggin geeked out? and all these techno conversation about what is > > >> | > techno, they all suck. Go to Submerge or something and ask mike > > >> | > banks. The basic fact is there is good music and bad, and > > >> | > acoustic music and electronic music. Thats it. Cant you guys go > > >> | > back to talking about new records and old records????? what is this > > >> | > shiznit? You guys bore everyone! And of course Missy Elliot is at > > >> | > least a little techno. That isnt just hand drums behind her > > >> | > vocals. And Adam beyer is also techno, its just pounding. Its > > >> | > obviously not Rhythim is Rhythim , but no disrespect. Id rather > > >> | > use this list to find out dj dates for Derrick May or any other > > >> | > non-half-azzed dj, so if anybody knows, where and when is Derrick > > >> | > playing, in the US or abroad??? And everybody quit the shiznit, > > >> | > save it for your toilets > > >> | > > >> | > > >> > > > >
