To be honest, when I hear an amazing track and check the date and its when I was listening to something tottaly different I kind of get a mini anxiety attack...
-----Original Message----- From: Rob Jarvis. Victoria Music Ltd. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 1:48 a.m. To: Andrew; 313 Mailing List Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations My memory's so SH*T these days that i encourage the use of 'context' especially the year of release ;-) Rob Jarvis Victoria Music Ltd. Unit 215 old gramaphone works 326 Kensal Road London W10 5BZ + 44 (0)20 7565 8193 voice + 44 (0)20 8960 3834 fax http://www.victoria-music.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MSN messenger) pro-jex + killa bite + inform + subvoice + room tone + housedust + nepenta + u7 + kne' deep + rodeo meat + response audio + sounds unique + hypercubic + radio sonic + neon + feedback > From: "Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:29:38 -0000 > To: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "James Bucknell" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "313 Mailing List" > <313@hyperreal.org> > Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations > > Well, maybe there is an interesting point here. Do tracks just stand alone, > without any context in time? I personally like to know when a track was > done, it gives me an idea of how the artist was affected by the scene > surrounding them, and the influences that are at play. > > I have tracks that are wicked for the time, but now sound a a little dated. > They still retain some of their original power, but now can be seen as > important advances for their respective times. Maybe the dispute arose over > listing years that are quite recent? Seeing tracklistings with (2001), > (2000), or (1998) in them might look overly anal, but still I like to trace > an artist's development, so for me it's important information. > > Just my tuppence, > > Andrew > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "James Bucknell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313 > Mailing List" <313@hyperreal.org> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:16 PM > Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations > > >> Now we are going to argue about putting years of tracks on tracklists, or >> not - I had thought I'd seen the further limits of triviality on this > list, >> till now!! >> >> ¦-D >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: James Bucknell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 4:12 AM >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313 Mailing List >>> Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations >>> >>> >>> the reason for putting the year of release in a track listing is the same >>> reason that track listings mention the artist, title, record label and > mix. >>> it's information that is useful for those that want to track it down. >>> james >>> >>> >>>> | >>>> | >>>> | > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> | > Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 07:29:39 -0500 >>>> | > To: 313@hyperreal.org >>>> | > Subject: (313) playlists and conversations >>>> | > >>>> | > For the person giving the years on his playlists, isnt that very >>>> | > fuggin geeked out? and all these techno conversation about what is >>>> | > techno, they all suck. Go to Submerge or something and ask mike >>>> | > banks. The basic fact is there is good music and bad, and >>>> | > acoustic music and electronic music. Thats it. Cant you guys go >>>> | > back to talking about new records and old records????? what is this >>>> | > shiznit? You guys bore everyone! And of course Missy Elliot is at >>>> | > least a little techno. That isnt just hand drums behind her >>>> | > vocals. And Adam beyer is also techno, its just pounding. Its >>>> | > obviously not Rhythim is Rhythim , but no disrespect. Id rather >>>> | > use this list to find out dj dates for Derrick May or any other >>>> | > non-half-azzed dj, so if anybody knows, where and when is Derrick >>>> | > playing, in the US or abroad??? And everybody quit the shiznit, >>>> | > save it for your toilets >>>> | >>>> | >>>> >>> >
