wow, 40 posts and we're still off topic :P for all of you serious about techno, are there any real lists that stick on topic and isn't 90 percent whining and arguing about every damn thing that is posted?
of the 4 lists I'm on, this has the least traffic and the lowest signal to noise ratio. I'd like to replace its periodic functionality if possible. thanks -Joe -----Original Message----- From: ::) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 1:40 a.m. To: 313 Mailing List Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) This party, what year was it ? >ok so hi >we should end this and talk about something else. what about the new hawtin and vath album? I never heard anyone talk about it anyone wanna have a party? -Joe ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "James Bucknell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313 Mailing List" <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:29 AM Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations > Well, maybe there is an interesting point here. Do tracks just stand alone, > without any context in time? I personally like to know when a track was > done, it gives me an idea of how the artist was affected by the scene > surrounding them, and the influences that are at play. > > I have tracks that are wicked for the time, but now sound a a little dated. > They still retain some of their original power, but now can be seen as > important advances for their respective times. Maybe the dispute arose over > listing years that are quite recent? Seeing tracklistings with (2001), > (2000), or (1998) in them might look overly anal, but still I like to trace > an artist's development, so for me it's important information. > > Just my tuppence, > > Andrew > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "James Bucknell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313 > Mailing List" <313@hyperreal.org> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:16 PM > Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations > > > > Now we are going to argue about putting years of tracks on tracklists, or > > not - I had thought I'd seen the further limits of triviality on this > list, > > till now!! > > > > ¦-D > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: James Bucknell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 4:12 AM > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313 Mailing List > > >Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations > > > > > > > > >the reason for putting the year of release in a track listing is the same > > >reason that track listings mention the artist, title, record label and > mix. > > >it's information that is useful for those that want to track it down. > > >james > > > > > > > > >> | > > >> | > > >> | > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> | > Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 07:29:39 -0500 > > >> | > To: 313@hyperreal.org > > >> | > Subject: (313) playlists and conversations > > >> | > > > >> | > For the person giving the years on his playlists, isnt that very > > >> | > fuggin geeked out? and all these techno conversation about what is > > >> | > techno, they all suck. Go to Submerge or something and ask mike > > >> | > banks. The basic fact is there is good music and bad, and > > >> | > acoustic music and electronic music. Thats it. Cant you guys go > > >> | > back to talking about new records and old records????? what is this > > >> | > shiznit? You guys bore everyone! And of course Missy Elliot is at > > >> | > least a little techno. That isnt just hand drums behind her > > >> | > vocals. And Adam beyer is also techno, its just pounding. Its > > >> | > obviously not Rhythim is Rhythim , but no disrespect. Id rather > > >> | > use this list to find out dj dates for Derrick May or any other > > >> | > non-half-azzed dj, so if anybody knows, where and when is Derrick > > >> | > playing, in the US or abroad??? And everybody quit the shiznit, > > >> | > save it for your toilets > > >> | > > >> | > > >> > > > >
