Hmmm... I'm guessing that if a bad Techno record is mixed at a party while geeks are discussing it, that makes it Detroit.
Rob Jarvis Victoria Music Ltd. Unit 215 old gramaphone works 326 Kensal Road London W10 5BZ + 44 (0)20 7565 8193 voice + 44 (0)20 8960 3834 fax http://www.victoria-music.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MSN messenger) pro-jex + killa bite + inform + subvoice + room tone + housedust + nepenta + u7 + kne' deep + rodeo meat + response audio + sounds unique + hypercubic + radio sonic + neon + feedback > From: Ralf Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 02:34:37 +1300 > To: "'Rob Jarvis. Victoria Music Ltd.'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "'313@hyperreal.org'" <313@hyperreal.org> > Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) > > im confused now...does the year or the music make the techno good or bad, or > does it all hinge on the geeks discussion... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Jarvis. Victoria Music Ltd. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 2:24 a.m. > To: Ralf Gill; 313 Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) > > > LOL. > that's more like it. discussing a geek's party is quite geeky in itself. > and as we all know there are good discussions and bad discussions. (2003) > > Rob Jarvis > > Victoria Music Ltd. > Unit 215 old gramaphone works > 326 Kensal Road > London > W10 5BZ > + 44 (0)20 7565 8193 voice > + 44 (0)20 8960 3834 fax > > http://www.victoria-music.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MSN messenger) > > pro-jex + killa bite + inform + subvoice + room tone + housedust + nepenta + > u7 + kne' deep + rodeo meat + response audio + sounds unique + hypercubic + > radio sonic + neon + feedback > >> From: Ralf Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 01:49:18 +1300 >> To: "'Brendan Nelson'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'313@hyperreal.org'" >> <313@hyperreal.org> >> Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) >> >> Yeah, but sometimes it makes the bad party more relevant, like I went to a >> party in 1983, by the time I stopped it was 1994, and although the party > and >> all the people looked totally out-dated, when we told the hospital the > year >> they said it was cool because they could see how i ended up like this... >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Brendan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 1:41 a.m. >> To: Ralf Gill; ::); 313@hyperreal.org >> Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) >> >> >> That's not relevant! As we all know, there are just good parties and bad >> parties. Discussing when they actually happen is fuggin geeked out... :) >> >> | -----Original Message----- >> | From: Ralf Gill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> | Sent: 18 February 2003 12:42 >> | To: '::)'; '313@hyperreal.org' >> | Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) >> | >> | >> | >> | >> | -----Original Message----- >> | From: ::) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> | Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 1:40 a.m. >> | To: 313 Mailing List >> | Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) >> | >> | >> | >> | This party, what year was it ? >> | >> | >> | >ok so hi >> | >> | >we should end this and talk about something else. >> | >> | what about the new hawtin and vath album? I never heard >> | anyone talk about >> | it >> | >> | anyone wanna have a party? >> | >> | >> | -Joe >> | >> | >> | ----- Original Message ----- >> | From: "Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> | To: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "James Bucknell" >> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313 Mailing List" >> | <313@hyperreal.org> >> | Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:29 AM >> | Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations >> | >> | >> | > Well, maybe there is an interesting point here. Do tracks just stand >> | alone, >> | > without any context in time? I personally like to know when >> | a track was >> | > done, it gives me an idea of how the artist was affected by >> | the scene >> | > surrounding them, and the influences that are at play. >> | > >> | > I have tracks that are wicked for the time, but now sound a a little >> | dated. >> | > They still retain some of their original power, but now >> | can be seen as >> | > important advances for their respective times. Maybe the >> | dispute arose >> | over >> | > listing years that are quite recent? Seeing tracklistings >> | with (2001), >> | > (2000), or (1998) in them might look overly anal, but still >> | I like to >> | trace >> | > an artist's development, so for me it's important information. >> | > >> | > Just my tuppence, >> | > >> | > Andrew >> | > >> | > >> | > ----- Original Message ----- >> | > From: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> | > To: "James Bucknell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313 >> | > Mailing List" <313@hyperreal.org> >> | > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:16 PM >> | > Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations >> | > >> | > >> | > > Now we are going to argue about putting years of tracks >> | on tracklists, >> | or >> | > > not - I had thought I'd seen the further limits of >> | triviality on this >> | > list, >> | > > till now!! >> | > > >> | > > ¦-D >> | > > >> | > > >-----Original Message----- >> | > > >From: James Bucknell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> | > > >Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 4:12 AM >> | > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313 Mailing List >> | > > >Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations >> | > > > >> | > > > >> | > > >the reason for putting the year of release in a track >> | listing is the >> | same >> | > > >reason that track listings mention the artist, title, >> | record label and >> | > mix. >> | > > >it's information that is useful for those that want to >> | track it down. >> | > > >james >> | > > > >> | > > > >> | > > >> | >> | > > >> | >> | > > >> | > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> | > > >> | > Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 07:29:39 -0500 >> | > > >> | > To: 313@hyperreal.org >> | > > >> | > Subject: (313) playlists and conversations >> | > > >> | > >> | > > >> | > For the person giving the years on his playlists, >> | isnt that very >> | > > >> | > fuggin geeked out? and all these techno >> | conversation about what >> | is >> | > > >> | > techno, they all suck. Go to Submerge or >> | something and ask mike >> | > > >> | > banks. The basic fact is there is good music >> | and bad, and >> | > > >> | > acoustic music and electronic music. Thats it. >> | Cant you guys go >> | > > >> | > back to talking about new records and old >> | records????? what is >> | this >> | > > >> | > shiznit? You guys bore everyone! And of course >> | Missy Elliot is >> | at >> | > > >> | > least a little techno. That isnt just hand drums >> | behind her >> | > > >> | > vocals. And Adam beyer is also techno, its just >> | pounding. Its >> | > > >> | > obviously not Rhythim is Rhythim , but no >> | disrespect. Id rather >> | > > >> | > use this list to find out dj dates for Derrick May >> | or any other >> | > > >> | > non-half-azzed dj, so if anybody knows, where and >> | when is Derrick >> | > > >> | > playing, in the US or abroad??? And everybody quit >> | the shiznit, >> | > > >> | > save it for your toilets >> | > > >> | >> | > > >> | >> | > > >> >> | > > > >> | > >> |
