No, but it would be cool!
Mills got cussed when he started playing disco cuts amongst his usual fare but 
sensible and open-minded people thought it was an inspired move.
Are you one of those guys who moans at a Hood gig cos he plays Destiny's Child 
or Wu Tang?
Possibly my favourite DJ is Laurent Garnier and he plays a bit of everything 
from house to techno to d'n'b to rave - and we love him for it.
Why do think so many people rate FK ferchrissakes? I heard him an astonishing 
variety of genres at his last gig at Plastic People -  I only heard one person 
bitching about it and he was a total nob.
One of the reasons I'm looking forward to Carl Craig at Plastic People in 
London is because I am hoping he will mix it up.
 -----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Snowden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 12:40 PM
To: Robert Taylor; Ryan Snowden; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) 313 Weekend in London


Has everyone gone mad?

If you go to a gig and Vogel is playing, you don't expect him to break out
in gospel house do you?


|-----Original Message-----
|From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
|Sent: 14 July 2003 14:36
|To: Ryan Snowden; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
|Subject: RE: (313) 313 Weekend in London
|
|
|I think it's lame to go to a gig and hope everything confirms 
|to a narrowly prescribed set of parameters - ie it all must be 
|techno. There's not enough diversity in clubbing and I applaud 
|anyone making the effort to promote variety in a club night.
|
|-----Original Message-----
|From: Ryan Snowden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 12:27 PM
|To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 313@hyperreal.org
|Subject: RE: (313) 313 Weekend in London
|
|
|Cr4p to that.
|
|If you're going to put on a hip hop gig or broken beats then 
|you get a hip hop dude, not some deep house dj off a label in 
|detroit who has a few half baked outdated hip hop records in 
|his collection which SURPRISE he is partial too.  That 
|combined with an MC trying to rhyme over aint-changin' really 
|takes the piss!  I can deal with curtains and heat, but I can 
|deal with a gig which is "oh a bit of everything really".  
|That's not progression, its LAME.
|
||-----Original Message-----
||From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
||Sent: 14 July 2003 13:26
||To: 313@hyperreal.org
||Subject: RE: (313) 313 Weekend in London
||
||
||
||>A hip hop gig where they play deep house & disco.  Interesting.  It
||>must
||be
||>a manchester thing.. You know, next thing mills will be playing drum
||>and bass.
||
||WTF?????????
||
||It's called sticking your neck out and trying to progress
||things. Yeah, they play disco, deep house, broken beat, hip 
||hop, hungarian jazz, pop, techno, whatever. It's a hip hop 
||party, because that's where they come from. alot of their 
||guests are hip hop people too. I think they'd probably try to 
||put more techno and house guests on but I think they worry 
||that most house/techno people wouldn't understand the 
||asthetics of the party. Recloose was someone who fitted in to 
||their way of thinking because he plays across the board. Who 
||was their last guest? was it ?ouestlove ?
||
||and, no. It isn't a 'Manchester' thing, it's a trying to do
||something different at no personal gain for the people in 
||Manchester as there aren't alot of others trying.
||
||Jesus f**king christ. You've really pi**ed me off by saying
||that. Good parties in manchester are few and far between, can 
||you not look to the positive points?
||
||They had to sell out that party to even break-even. They still
||went ahead anyway. they thought people might enjoy it. I was 
||there at the end. Looked like a load of people enjoyed it to 
||me. I certainly did. But then, if you're going to let a 
||curtain ruin your night and then moan about it, then well, I 
||dunno. 
||_________________________________________________________________
||
||--------------------- End of message text --------------------
||
||This e-mail is sent by the above named in their
||individual, non-business capacity and is not on
||behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers.
||
||PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming
||e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and 
||telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you 
||give your consent to such monitoring
||
||
||
|###############################################################
|######################
|Note:
|
|Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do 
|not necessarily represent 
|those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless 
|specifically stated. This email 
|and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely 
|for the use of the 
|individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have 
|received this email in 
|error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|Thank You. 
|###############################################################
|######################
|
#####################################################################################
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent 
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This 
email 
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this 
email in 
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.
#####################################################################################

Reply via email to