----- Original Message ----- From: "Sakari Karipuro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "313" <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 10:37 PM Subject: RE: (313) Vestax or Technics
> ian cheshire wrote on Sun, 27 Jul 2003 about following: > > > of practice) emulate the reverse action thus enhancing your technique :) + > > 16 is a good feature but one simple turn of a screw and you'll have the same > > > not to diss anyone personally, there is ABSOLUTELY no need for pitch > above +4% or less than -2%. if you come into such situation you don't > have enough records with you. I've said it before too, and I'll say it again: I could not disagree more. Angola sounds wrong at less than +6. Heard it tonight at 0ish and it sounded sh*t. Some Theo sounds wicked at +12. Some Jacek Sienkiewicz sounds great at -6. Kunuyuki's 'Precious Hall' is criminally slow at less than +5. It loses everything it needs at less than 125 BPM. Most of your audience will not know your songs well enough to know that vocals should be at a different pitch, and most bass will not suffer enough to make a difference. Using +/-8 gives you a hell of a lot more room to work when spinning less than 90 minutes. How are you going to cover any ground if you stay within +4/-2 in a 60 minute set? That's completely limiting in my opinion. Work that sh*t! :) Tristan ======= Text/Mixes/Pics: http://www.phonopsia.co.uk Music: http://www.mp313.com Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
