joke gone "poof"
Martin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
com> cc: 313
<313@hyperreal.org>, David Powers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sakari
Karipuro
07/29/03 11:21 AM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: (313) RE: Vestax
or Technics
It's already there on the new ones, pitch bend a go go...
> You know I heard that Vestax is working on that sideways pitch thing...
er
> just to bring it back to the original discussion.
> ;)
> MEK
>
>
>
> Martin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Sakari Karipuro
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> com> David Powers
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: 313
<313@hyperreal.org>
> 07/29/03 04:21 AM Subject: Re: (313) RE:
Vestax or
> Technics
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Come on guys, does it really matter if you pitch up, down or sideways -
> techno is about innovation not BPM.
>
> md
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 29/7/03 8:17 AM Sakari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> David Powers wrote on Mon, 28 Jul 2003 about following:
>>
>>> buy techno records that exceed 130 bpm, does this limit your buying
>>>
>>> with a Detroit feel. I can't imagine having that as my upper BPM limit
>>> really!
>>
>> i never said 130 is the upper limit. i said classic techno goes 130+
>> which obviously means it goes above that. and i said below 140 bpm for
>> the good stuff, regarding the rave records.
>>
>>
>> oh and David, you noticed it was private mail, not list mail, just like
>> your mail i replied to, but since you brought this back to the list i'll
>> keep it CC'd, although, i think it's time to let this discussion go;
>> i've said what i have to say about it already.
>>
>>
>> sakke
>
>
>
>
>
