I agree that in and of itself it is not earth-shattering, but they have
overcome the obstacle of the audience's general inability to connect
with
the performer, or better, the performance during a typical "laptop"
performance.
What? By touching a table instead of a keyboard? In both cases the
audience can't see what's happening. I hardly see any difference
between using audiopad or a faderbox.
I'd still like to know which you'd rather *watch* for, say, 45 minutes
- an
Audiopad performance or a standard laptop - if the music is exactly the
same?
I'd rather listen :)
Cheers,
Hans
--
Hans Veneman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://technotourist.org
