The problem is that "intrinsically knowledgable chicks" are occasionally
conniving each other's downfall. It's nice - and powerful - to be the only
woman in a male dominated arena and so when Ms Thing sees another girl, she
is gon' stop at nothing to mark out her territory, humilate you in front of
male colleagues, and just be as un-co-operative as she can.
I'd prefer the odd light sexist comment (which is rare) from a male to
another woman's brutal machinations. I call it B***h on B***h crime what
women do to each other.
Shame on you - bitching about women bitching about women. These are damaging
stereotypes, more so when women perpetuate them.
I don't know women like this, it depends on the person not the sex. And come
to think of it, i know loads and loads of blokes into techno and none of
them are into ornaments either.
Maybe you should move to London ;)
----------
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: Brendan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: RE: (313) Derrick May - "The Bush Administration Are the
Biggest
War Criminals of the 21st Century"
>Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 2:41 AM
>
> "forced" ? LOL! I don't think this phenomenon is unique to music ;)
>
> "intrinsically knowledgable chicks" need more care and feeding than
> armpieces (this is bound to happen if one has a brain *and* uses it) so if
> a guy isn't interested in that part of a woman, an armpiece will do just
> fine. that's how it's been explained to me, anyways.
>
> I saw lots of ladies at Movement '03 and they weren't all ornament looking
> - mostly 'real' looking and having lots of fun with the music - with or
> without the guys!
>
> lisa
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Brendan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Monday, February 2, 2004 9:47 am
> Subject: RE: (313) Derrick May - "The Bush Administration Are the Biggest
> War Criminals of the 21st Century"
>
>> Ah, but I'd say there's an extent to which a lot of these males
>> are kind of forced into a situation like that - you could spend
>> *years* looking around for someone whose mindset and interests are
>> very compatible with your own, but because most people fall more
>> into the "ornament" category, that's who you're most likely to end
>> up with.
>>
>> Given the choice, I think most techno-geek sort of blokes would go
>> for an "intrinsically knowledgable 'chick'" over an "ornament" any
>> day!
>> Brendan
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Katrin Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Sent: 02 February 2004 14:43
>> > To: Cyclone Wehner; 313@hyperreal.org
>> > Subject: AW: (313) Derrick May - "The Bush Administration Are the
>> > Biggest War Criminals of the 21st Century"
>> >
>> >
>> > Sometimes I am shocked that some really intelligent males who
>> > love to share
>> > their music with others choose these girls that are not into
>> > the music at
>> > all (but are really good looking)... some people just aren't
>> > into soul mates
>> > methinks.... But then, music isn't everything.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> > Von: Cyclone Wehner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Gesendet: Montag, 2. Februar 2004 15:13
>> > An: 313 Detroit
>> > Betreff: Re: (313) Derrick May - "The Bush Administration Are
>> > the Biggest
>> > War Criminals of the 21st Century"
>> >
>> >
>> > Hey, that's me, but I'm dieting. ;)
>> > But 80 percent of the male trainspotters *I know* go out with
>> > ornaments, not
>> > "intrinsically knowledgeable 'chicks", usually 21 years old,
>> > then they get
>> > frustrated that they don't have someone who gets their music. ;)
>> > It takes hours and money and effort to be the perfect female
>> specimen,> doesn't leave much time for music. ;))))
>> >
>> > ----------
>> > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >To: 313@hyperreal.org
>> > >Subject: RE: (313) Derrick May - "The Bush Administration
>> > Are the Biggest
>> > War
>> > Criminals of the 21st Century"
>> > >Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 1:26 AM
>> > >
>> >
>> > >
>> > > D.May Quote from Robert>"I always prefer to play to a chick who's
>> > > intrinsically knowledgeable about life, than a >shirtless,
>> > sweaty guy
>> > who'd
>> > > dance to anything that has a beat."
>> > >
>> > > Q. Who pays D.May's wages?
>> > >
>> > > is it
>> > >
>> > > a) intrinsically knowledgeable 'chick'?
>> > > or
>> > > b) sweaty guy who dances to anything with a beat?
>> > >
>> > > ha, I'd rather deliver the post to "intrinsically
>> > knowledgeable 'chick's"
>> > > too, but theres only fat sweaty accountants here. oh well.
>> > >
>> > > p.s. any "intrinsically knowledgeable 'chick's" with a
>> > large transmat
>> > > collection and ticket stubs for d.mays last gigs, drop me a
>> > line, I'd like
>> > > to buy you dinner.
>> > > _________________________________________________________________
>> > >
>> > > --------------------- End of message text --------------------
>> > >
>> > > This e-mail is sent by the above named in their
>> > > individual, non-business capacity and is not on
>> > > behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers.
>> > >
>> > > PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming
>> > > e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and
>> > > telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you
>> > > give your consent to such monitoring
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
