if you all rush out and get it now, theres nothing stopping them from
releasing the next one for a buck or two more.

consider that, but keep in mind that I respect you all as music listeners
and collectors, so holding off on a great piece of (available) vinyl isnt
always an option :)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J. T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 2:57 PM
Subject: RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?


> >but will you get this record? its certainly not easy to come by
> >used for nothing. im sure some people will have their stories, but
> >in a smaller city like pittsburgh, theres pretty much zero chance
> >of me coming up with that record.
>
> who cares. i'll get a dozen other records that are equally good. i'm a
music
> lover not a collector..in most cases..
> .
> >demand IS that great though! like i said=, all the distros with it
> >that ive seen (unique, watts, and 161) were out of it within hours
> >of having it in. and that was at a price of $10 wholesale!
>
> well we'll see how well the stores can actually sell it. none of the
people
> i was with at recordtime looked twice at it. too much other good chit to
buy
> for 1/3 the price
>
> >when the only other way to get it is through ebay, its worth that
> >by far. and i dont think this record needed any more hype than it
> >already has from being an excellent record.
>
> fart
>
> >also, AFAIK theres no difference between the repress and the
> >original. in 20 years, no one will know or even remember which one
> >is which.
>
> thats a completely false assertion. thats what record collecting is all
> about. my dad's been selling rare records for 40 years....and i've been
> selling stuff on ebay for quite awhile. music lovers dont care about
> pressings etc, but this chit isnt priced for music lovers. but it will be
> soon enough...in 20 years it will be very easy to remember which pressing
is
> which because the original will cost a fortune and the repress will be
> affordable...as it should be now.
>
> >the peacefrog joints are a whole other story. those are tunes with
> >no prior track record. i think that practice is a little weak,
>
> but the artist roster has plenty of draw. it's really not so different.
just
> sought after artists instead of sought after tracks..
>
> >much more willing to pay for records that i know and want that are
> >hard to get ahold of. their rarity and goodness is established,
> >not created.
>
> a repress is not rare and does not deserve that price, the end. you dont
> press a rare record, it becomes rare over time. the rarity of the original
> record is established. the inflated cost of a repress is just trying to
> quickly take advantage of the demand for the original. it's a cheap trick.
> guarantee you the repress will be worth less than current wholesale price
in
> 5 years.
>
> you're missing the point entirely. just because you can price something
high
> and still sell it ok doesnt mean you are justified in doing so (by
anything
> other than overzealous capitalism). clone could have priced their glass
> domain rerelease similarily, but didnt. because they are not trying to
> overcapitalize. your willingness to pay exorbitant prices does not excuse
> the jacked up pricetag...it makes you a sucker...
>
> >it hasnt taken one tiny bit of joy out of me finally being able to
> >own 4 jazz funk classics. if nothing else, im extremely excited.
>
> you got the collector itch in you, or a thick wallet -- i hope a thick
> wallet so you're still buying other stuff
>
> >if pressing small numbers and charging high prices will convince
> >people to repress hard to find classics, im ALL FOR IT. if carl
>
> cool, you're the one they're selling to then..
>
> >repressed each of the retroactive records at that price, id buy
> >each and every one of them.
>
> really? i sure wouldnt. they're not all great, some sound very dated now.
> but following this new pricing strategy down the line, why not just
repress
> 100 copies of the retroactive stuff and sell them for $100 each. make $10k
> off 100 records, yeahhhh! can you still not see why that sucks? from a
music
> lover's pov, it sucks....for the collectors, for the stores it's great...i
> pretty much make my living selling stuff to compulsive collectors, but i
am
> not about to become one, i cant afford it...
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now!
> http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
>

Reply via email to