Would you then consider an 909 drummachine to be oldschool, obsolete or ...?
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 20 april 2004 0:20 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: 313 Onderwerp: Re: (313) London May 1 (Yeah ok, it's about 'Lost'!!) case by case basis i suppose. ;) On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Can the same be applied to producers who rehash old sounds? > > MEK > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > et To: Jason Brunton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: 313 <313@hyperreal.org> > 04/19/04 04:17 PM Subject: Re: (313) London May 1 (Yeah ok, it's about 'Lost'!!) > > > > > > > no- play whatever you want. > > listen to whatever you want > dance to whatever you want. > > just don't use a catch-phrase to act like you're on some 'next' sh*t by > playing old records. > > > > > On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Jason Brunton wrote: > > > Does this mean I (or anyone else) shouldn't play a record that's "old" > > even if I just heard it for the first time and it's "new" to me?? I > > play records that are good- I really don't care how old or new they are > > > > Jason > > > > > > On 16 Apr 2004, at 18:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > >> > > >> We're gonna go back in order to go > > >> forward. > > > > > > > > > > Attention all techno everyones!!! Please stop using this excuse to be > > > retro. You are not going fowward by playing old records. You are being > > > retro- which is fine. But stop faking it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
