Kent is right on the money, listen to the words he is saying!

-p

----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313 list" <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 3:49 AM
Subject: RE: (313) My take on Laurent Garnier


> exsqueeze me Yussel....
>
> I agree with Ryan here and I think really you should take a listen to his
recent mixes on slsk...esp the one from Barcelona..oh and check out his mix
he did at Movement last year, oh and his set he did for LOST at Xmas oh and
etc etc etc.. :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Fri 30/04/2004 08:26
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT)
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 313 list
> Subject: RE: (313) My take on Laurent Garnier
>
>
>
> Absolute rubbish Yussell- did you even bother thinking when yuo typed
that?
> And you know, you're comments just don't have any of your intended "shock
> value" anymore.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 April 2004 6:18
> To: Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT)
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 313 list
> Subject: RE: (313) My take on Laurent Garnier
>
>
> >
> > Interestingly, Mills gets a continual slating for "trying something
> > different" -
>
> in DJing, Mills is playing the EXACT same set for 10 years.
>
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 27 April 2004 4:17
> > To: 313 list
> > Subject: RE: (313) My take on Laurent Garnier
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > So is his entire career being judged on one night?  Seems that way from
> > what you're saying.
> >
> > read this again - "an inexcusable half-hour" - a half-hour?! You're
> > complaining about a half-hour?!  Out of how much time all together?
> >
> > christ almighty - let him try something different for a minute will ya?
> It
> > might not have worked for you but maybe it was working for someone else.
> > if it wasn't working for anyone then so be it but don't f*cking crucify
> the
> > guy just because he tries something different than what you are
expecting
> >
> > this calls to mind the whole thing about the preconceptions we take with
> us
> > to shows and then if the event doesn't live up to what we want or expect
> it
> > "sucks" or the dj was a "disappointment".  For example, Stacey Pullen
just
> > played here.  Even though I didn't stay for the entire event I heard
from
> > others that he played a fine set.  He was well on his way to it when I
was
> > leaving (don't ask - I was exhausted from work).
> > Now the next day I'm hearing from loads of other people that they were
> > disappointed with his set. Turns out they thought he was going to play
> > "TECHNO!!!!!!", if you know what I mean.
> > Most of the local jocks who call themselves techno djs were on the bill
> and
> > were all hyped about Stacey playing.  Well of course they were
> > disappointed. It's not his style but they thought that's what he would
> > play.
> >
> >
> > MEK
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >                       "Robert Taylor"
> >
> >                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:       "Kent williams"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "313 list" <313@hyperreal.org>
> >                       4.co.uk>                 cc:
> >
> >                                                Subject:  RE: (313) My
take
> > on Laurent Garnier
> >                       04/27/04 10:52 AM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I was at the gig Martin was at and he was quite disappointing - He
played
> a
> > 'party' section as if he was a at a student's union. He played Out Of
> > Space, which was welcome last year at Sonar, but when he drops it in set
> > after set, the novelty wears off a bit. He played an inexusable half
hour
> > of execrable nuskoolbreaks.  He also played some excellent stuff but he
> > certainly seemed a shadow of his former self -  every set was full of
> > surprises in the old days and he did seemed to be treading water on this
> > occasion - last year's Sonar set was one of my favourite clubbing
> > experiences ever, so I am not 'hating' him, just demonstrating why
Martin
> > made those comments about him
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kent williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 2:45 PM
> > To: 313 list
> > Subject: (313) My take on Laurent Garnier
> >
> >
> > After all the hooting and hollering, I think a couple of things need
> > to be said:
> >
> > 1. Laurent is one of the O.G. Technotourists, who started coming to
> Detroit
> > to hang out and play years and years ago. He is every bit the fan as you
> or
> > I. He LOVES Detroit -- the music and the city and the people.
> >
> > 2. While he's not the only producer in France, or the first, he is one
of
> > France's true pioneers in Dance music, and is a hero to French kids.
> France
> > is in its own way as insular and conservative as the US, and Laurent
> > introduced
> > and championed US house and techno to an audience that isn't always
> > receptive
> > to new music from elsewhere. His infectious enthusiasm for the music,
and
> > his skills in reading and motivating a crowd, allows him to lead and
> > educate
> > an audience.
> >
> > If you don't like him, or were underwhelmed when you saw him, that's
> fine..
> > It's horses for courses.  I only like some of what he's done as a
> producer.
> > But I will always have huge respect for what he's accomplished
> >
> >
>
############################################################################
> > #########
> >
> > Note:
> >
> > Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not
> necessarily
> > represent
> > those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated.
> > This email
> > and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the
use
> > of the
> > individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received
> this
> > email in
> > error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Thank You.
> >
>
############################################################################
> > #########
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
****************************************************************************
> ***********
> > Opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and
> > not Entergy-Koch Trading Limited or its affiliated companies.
> > This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies
> > and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently
> > transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the
> > use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by
> > attorney-client privilege. If you are not listed on the "To" or "Cc"
> > lines of the original email (or are not the person responsible for
> > delivering to an intended recipient), then you are not an intended
> > recipient and have received this email in error.  Any use by an
> > unintended recipient is strictly prohibited.
> >
> > If you have received this email in error please notify the IT manager
> > by telephone on +44 (0)20 7337 8300 or via email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED], attaching this message. Please
> > then delete this email and all attachments, and destroy any copies
> > thereof.  Thank you.
> >
>
****************************************************************************
> ***********
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
****************************************************************************
***********
> Opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and
> not Entergy-Koch Trading Limited or its affiliated companies.
> This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies
> and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently
> transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the
> use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by
> attorney-client privilege. If you are not listed on the "To" or "Cc"
> lines of the original email (or are not the person responsible for
> delivering to an intended recipient), then you are not an intended
> recipient and have received this email in error.  Any use by an
> unintended recipient is strictly prohibited.
>
> If you have received this email in error please notify the IT manager
> by telephone on +44 (0)20 7337 8300 or via email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], attaching this message. Please
> then delete this email and all attachments, and destroy any copies
> thereof.  Thank you.
>
****************************************************************************
***********
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to