dont know where his home town is, but assuming its detroit, I remember some
rumor of him saying he would not play in detroit for a while because about
10 people showed at the last show he'd played at in detroit (I was there, it
was great music but he was obviously annoyed about the promotion and
turnout, and rightfully so. )

I think this was last year, and I've not seen him show up on any flyers, but
Im by no means in the loop. (any for that matter)

-Joe

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "FC2 Richards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 12:40 AM
Subject: RE: (313) INFLUENCE.


> A ton of those DJ's can play the tracks out too...you know they don't just
> cut it up and that is what I like.  DJ T-1000 is another, and it is
> unfortunate that he doesn't get booked in his home town more...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 1:31 AM
> To: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: Re: (313) INFLUENCE.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Robert Taylor wrote:
>
> >Leave it to the hiphop DJs - I want to hear the record!
>
> I realize that it's just not your style - but why let the hip-hop DJs have
> all the fun?
> I'd love to see more DJs be able to do what Claude, Shake, Mills, and
> similar styled artists do
> If a techno DJ shouldn't scratch, cut, use their nose, elbow, etc. then
> what about people like DJ Craze?
> Are they not supposed to play house, drum & bass, and techno mixed in with
> their hip-hop?
>
> some of them drum looped techno tracks only have one good part - I don't
> want to hear the entire thing played out and mixed seamlessly into the
next
> drum loop. That bores me to tears. It takes all kinds of DJs to make a
> party: The David Mancuso's who don't want to overlap a single tune; those
> who blend, mix, and select well but would sooner scratch their @ss then
try
> and scratch a record; and those that barely let a second go by without
some
> kind of manipulation of the record/mixer/turntable.
>
> As long as they do it with conviction then I'm all for it.
>
> MEK

Reply via email to