different maurizio, thank god... 

how many old maurizio productions are on tresor btw? i have one blake baxter he 
did, but i think there must be more..

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dinsdag 20 juli 2004 12:55
To: 313@Hyperreal.Org
Subject: RE: (313) Spotters Quiz


OK here's some questions some of which I might answer myself if only I could
wait till I got home but since I've actually got into work today and found
no-one waiting at my office door to bug me I'm gonna waste you's lots time
instead:

>BTW - Ploy is deffo the first Maurizio record.

fair enough but wasn't there another really mad acidy one from round the
same time?  Tried looking at Discogs for an answer but only end up with more
questions:


all the best known M records are listed there loads appearing on comps but
there's some I'm less familiar with

TT/FF of Tresor II - I've got this but can't remember how it goes!

and most intriguing (but bound to turn out to be a misprint of M6?) Maurizio
 MG (Version)


plus some unknown (to me) mixes:

Moving On (Mix Master Dub)
    Featuring - Charle' Bishop
  Remix - Costantino 'Mixmaster' Padovano , Maurizio
Moving On (Voice Of The Underground)
    Featuring - Charle' Bishop
  Remix - Costantino 'Mixmaster' Padovano , Maurizio

Hustlers Convention  Turn It Up (Maurizio Mix) (6:04)
    Remix - Maurizio

Hamburgher Party (Latino House) - Maurizio Ketch-Up Version
    Remix - Maurizio

I guess although these are listed on the page for Moritz Von Oswald it's
possible it could be a different Maurizio?  These things aren't always right
on Discogs, I recently bought some G-Man (who ever wanted their ashes
pressed into Avanti, I'm with you!) records off Gemm that were listed on Gez
Varley's Discogs page but turned out not to be by him.

So what does anyone know?  Guess this post could have come under "Tuesday
Trivia".  And no it hasn't taken me all morning to write somebody turned up
at my door 5 mins after I started it and I've only just finished it now
before I have to leave my office for today so I'll have to till tomorrow to
see your answers!



The information contained in this e-mail communication is solely intended for 
the person/legal person to whom it  has been sent, and as it may contain 
information of a personal or confidential nature, it may not be made public by 
virtue of law, regulations or agreement. If someone other than the intended 
recipient should receive or come into possession of this e-mail communication, 
he/she will not be entitled to read, disseminate, disclose or duplicate it. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are requested to inform the sender of 
this e-mail message of this immediately, and to destroy the original e-mail 
communication. Neither Randstad Holding nv nor its subsidiaries accept any 
liability for incorrect and incomplete transmission or delayed receipt of this 
e-mail.

Reply via email to