Miss Kitten is definitely worth seeing in my book. I dont care for
her production stuff or that 80s/electroclash junk, but she is a
very talented dj. Her sets are mostly euro-techno, with little bits
of electro and more eclectic stuff thrown in to spice it up. More
technasia than larry tee. I'm seeing her friday in DC and am quite
excited about it actually. 
 -bsb


Quoting Carlos de Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> nah, don't expect only "electro clash/boring 80s redux".
> her lastest album is excellent, diverse. try this as a review:
> http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:pgeq97ydkrjt~T1.
> and if
> she's djing (she can definetely "pump the floor") with matthew
> dear, it
> might also go this way round:
> http://www.discogs.com/release/135858. at
> end, you might hope that there is no door to leave. ;)
> 
> c.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2004 02:18
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
> Betreff: Re: (313) miss kitten ?
> 
> 
> my advice:  go see matthew dear, then make for the door quickly.
> 
> - jobot
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 7:15 pm
> Subject: (313) miss kitten ?
> 
> > Hey I was hoping that folks on this list would have an opinion
> > about whether it is worth going out of my way to see miss
> kitten?  
> > It is a pricey show, mathew dear is opening, but it is one of
> only 
> > a couple of techno-esque shows that have come to San Francisco
> 
> > this year.  I don't like electro clash/boring 80s redux at all
> 
> > (but i like anthony rother), so I haven't really checked out
> her 
> > records before.  I generally like to support anything that 
> > happens, just because it is happening, but for 20 bones and
> some 
> > scheduling conflicts, I need to know if this is something that
> 
> > will  pump the floor and inspire me musically or be chin 
> > scratching paradise and   bore me.  Any thoughts?  Off list.  
> > thanks, 
> > 
> 
> 


Reply via email to