>So has anyone spoken out publicly about these bootlegs? I mean I would >assume that Derrick would be fuming because they're using his >Transmat logo without permission (or are they?). If it's done without the >artist's permission, whoever is producing these should pray they don't get >caught - copyright and trademark infringements, publishing infringements, >licensing infringements... >they better take all the money they're making off of these and sock it away >because if they get busted that's going to be one hell of a lawsuit. >I still don't get why Submerge is selling them unless it's an inside job
Hmm, yeah. I can't see any of them letting anyone getting away with any bootlegging. Strange then that they keep appearing right? Not that strange. Still, it's their chit innit. _________________________________________________________________ --------------------- End of message text -------------------- Is your business ready for the new era of accounting? http://www.ifrs.co.uk ---------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers. PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring
