As far as file copying, CD ripping etc, the piggies are out of the
barn.  Most DRM systems can be defeated pretty easily, and when all
else fails,  anyone with a good soundcard can make a high quality
digital copy via analog loopback of protected digital files.

So DRM is a joke. It only stops people the way a cheap bike lock does
-- it deters the casual thief.

Similarly, the legal pursuit of file sharers is doomed to failure. 
They can go after easy, stationary targets, but they'll never get the
technical edge over the file sharers.  We're only in the very early
stages of what's possible with decentralized peer to peer  software.

The only way forward I can see for artists is this:

1. Give away lossy digital copies of your music, as promotion.
2. Emphasize the audio quality of the 'real thing' -- the paid for copy.
3. Make sure the physical object you're selling adds value over the
digital copy -- either by adding tracks, attractive packaging, or some
sort of  unique value you don't get downloading it digitally.
4. Perform live, or DJ or do something where you're selling a unique
event that can't be endlessly reproduced and distributed over the
internet.

I actually like #4 because it means that musicians have to actually be
able to perform their art in front of audiences.   For  a long time --
starting when the Beatles announced they weren't going to tour again,
up until the mid-90s -- live performance was an poor cousin of records
and radio play.  Now, a lot of musicians have found, of necessity,
that a much larger percentage of their income will have to come from
playing in front of people.

Reply via email to