On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 07:49:11AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have quite a few old EPs that have "tranctastic mixes" on them.  Alot
> of the Definitive records that I have, have some sort of "trance" version of
> the tune...

Didn't Submerge label the Red Planet releases as "Trance" years ago?

Cheers,
Hans



> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, M : A : T : R : I : X wrote:
> 
> > look at all of us trance lovers coming out of the closet! :^)
> >
> >
> > on 1/28/05 6:40 AM, fab. at [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered these words:
> >
> > > i have this compilation as well and it is a damn fine one if i may say
> > > so.....
> > > goes back to the time when there wasnt much of a difference between trance
> > > and techno, when trance wasnt a dirty word. hell, there are even UR tracks
> > > that i call 'trance'...
> > >
> > > what went wrong? i dont know..marketing maybe wanted to divide the 2.
> > > or maybe trance appealed to ppl that didnt enjoy techno....or, maybe it 
> > > was
> > > the drugs.
> > > trance was intended for ppl to space out  to and evade into utopian dreams
> > > of universal love etc while techno developed into a more of a dystopian
> > > urban and post-industrial aesthetic.
> > >
> > > just off the top of my head,
> > > fab
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "M : A : T : R : I : X" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org>
> > > Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 12:14 PM
> > > Subject: Re: (313) No Movement 2005?
> > >
> > >
> > >> oh wait...are we 313ers still supposed to hate Trance? oops! I forgot 
> > >> that
> > >> "trance" was supposed to be taboo. a few weeks ago I was at a Dollar 
> > >> Store
> > >> and as I was checking out there was a CD display near the register. as I
> > >> spun through the terrible selection I came across a double CD compilation
> > >> on
> > >> Rising High Records called "The Secret Life of Trance". it included 
> > >> tracks
> > >> by Timo Mass and Jam & Spoon and it was only one dollar...so I bought it.
> > >> I
> > >> figured it would be good for a laugh or two. so while cleaning house the
> > >> other day I decided to put it on and give it a listen before throwing it
> > >> away, but ended up listening to it straight through. it's actually quite
> > >> good! (?) I apologize, guys. it was an accident and it only happened 
> > >> once.
> > >> I
> > >> swear! I feel so dirty. but at least it wasnt "electro clash"! :)
> > >>
> > >> oh and regarding movement: maybe it's time to take it off of life 
> > >> support?
> > >> it's already made history and has it's place in our hearts forever. why
> > >> not
> > >> just let it go? Keeping a "version" of it alive artificially or in an
> > >> altered form would do nothing but tarnish the fond memories of what it
> > >> once
> > >> was. Have you ever had your favorite danceclub/party/event outlive it's
> > >> natural lifespan? it gets pretty sad at the end. examples: Lollaplooza?
> > >> Motor Lounge? The Limelight? Ministry Of Sound?
> > >>
> > >> DEMF: Do Not Resuscitate
> > >>
> > >> I have nothing against the DEMF/Movement festival or it's organizers. I
> > >> performed at the very first (where I was paid quite handsomely) and what
> > >> may
> > >> turn out to be the very last one (where I performed for absolutely free)
> > >> and
> > >> would gladly do it again if they needed me to, but if the only way to 
> > >> keep
> > >> it going is to make it an "Area One" monster rock show, then it's time to
> > >> let it rest in peace and take it's rightful place as a part of the 
> > >> history
> > >> of Detroit Techno.
> > >>
> > >> sean deason
> > >>
> > >> on 1/27/05 9:14 PM, Anton Banks (313) at [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered these
> > >> words:
> > >>
> > >>>>> and a trendy headliner would be good too.
> > >>>
> > >>> I can see it now- "Now playing on the trance stage..."
> > >>>
> > >>> <<said with extreme sarcasm>>

-- 
Hans Veneman
http://technotourist.org
http://vlokfeest.net

Reply via email to