absolutely, don't forget that the article is aimed at people who know almost nothing about dance music and it points out a large number of the sites I regularly visit. I was quite impressed when I first read it...
> I disagree with all the negative comments on the list about this > article. > First of all, I see no factual errors in the article, which is > unfortunately rather rare in these kinds of articles. Second, it doesn't > focus on the well-known artists we all love to hate, but instead gives > respect where respect is due. Finally, it's an article about dance > music, not just about techno and particularly for a UK audience, you > can't ignore UK garage (imagine the Freep writing about dance music and > ignoring Detroit techno!). > > I think that -given the constraints of writing for such a broad > audience- it is actually a pretty good article. > > Otto > PS If Martin himself is still on the list, maybe he can comment about > writing about an insider topic for a broad audience. > > ------------------------------ > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
