Why is it that seemingly innocuous inquiries sent to this list invariably
lead to embittered polemics? I remember when this particular strain began
with a simple question on my part as to the general opinions circulating on
Mr. Hawtin's newest creation. Then came the inevitable Richie bashing.
What is it about the gent that stirs such negative emotion? Is it that he's
white or not a Detroit native or that he has gained a relatively large
following outside of the techno "underground" thanks to numerous
publications? I personally love the guy; his work touches me in a profound
manner. By this I don't necessarily mean his work has changed my outlook on
life, but his particular brand of techno (which I believe to be very
singular) appeals to that creative, imaginative, and (dare I say)
intellectual side of my being. And this doesn't even take into regard the
satisfaction my rhythmic nature finds in Richie's bare bones approach to the
essential beat. His work reinforces my love of techno, dammit!
Anyway, without digressing extravagantly, I think the argument centered
around the progression of technology as it relates to the creative process
has been steered the wrong way. Too many purists IMO. Where does techno
fit if technology is to be shunned and feared? (Yes, I'm well aware that
the whole of this list doesn't fear technology as a primitive would fear
fire.) It's all about how the technology is used and especially how the
material goods of our time are directed towards an end goal of individual
expression as it relates to current cultural trends and mindsets (both local
and global). Art should reflect the present and not be regarded separately,
for the key to its purpose lies in the questions, ruminations, ponderances,
and affirmations that result from it. Plus, don't forget that technology's
goal is to make life easier for us, to facilitate the tasks that we may
needlessly exert our limit energies towards accomplishing. If a new piece
of equipment opens doors to a whole new slate of artists who heretofore
haven't possessed the means or ability (or desire or time . . .) to express
themselves, all the better. The innovators will be singled out and
recognized, that is a guarantee. Besides, imitation comes before
innovation.
I don't know my thoughts are at all cohesive or if I'm rambling, but I'm
trying to cram multiple thoughts into this lunch break of mine. Time to get
back to work. (I can't wait to see what kind of an acerbic response I'll
get to this.)
Rusty
aka DJ MaybeIhavenocluewhatI'mtalkingabout
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
