there's nothing missing. and i havent heard yet a remix that sounds better than/as good as the original. nor blaze, nor spiller, nor the that floorplay version.
but that doesn't mean you can't give it another twist. especially when we're talking about such an overplayed (not in our days, but when it was new) track. i'd like to give a villalobos version a listen. c* -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:16:43 -0400 > Von: "Thomas D. Cox, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: 313@hyperreal.org > Betreff: Re: (313) a short luciano review > On 9/18/07, robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > He started off with a mix of deep house and minimal dropping the > > > acapella of a Blaze track over some beepy stuff and also a minimal > > > mix of that big St. Germain downtempo track that I've never heard > > > before and could be his own mix since he was playing on Serato. > > > > I've heard that is Villalobos related. > > i still dont understand why people dont just play the original "rose > rouge". what was that track missing that needed remixed?!?!?! > > tom
