Hmm. I don't think anyone has actually said it's new! -----Original Message----- From: fab. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 November 2007 07:55 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) OT -- something actually new, I think
yeah, i can't belive this album is getting championed as "new music"....for me there is nothing fresh and innovative in this album nor dubstep in general. what's new about slowed down ukgarage with muted sound effects and samples of rainfall? sounds like moody garage for heartbroken croydon chavs to me. it's even got the helium vocals for crying out loud! i found it very boring and flat. and dubstep just sounds like the dnb-ish trip hop that used to come out on austrian compilations back in the early nineties - and there is nothing new about that. i bet this dubstep thing will be off the radar in 18 months, just like what happened to the ex-new thing, broken beats. new music is out there ppl but most of you disdain it.............. f. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Emile Facey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Martin Dust" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "list 313" <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:14 PM Subject: Re: (313) OT -- something actually new, I think > There's nothing like Burial to divide a group, people seem to > absolutely > love it or just don' get it at all. Personally I'm with Martin all the > way here, give me some Scorn any day, Mick Harris has been doing it since > '91. > > > On 8 Nov 2007, at 11:51, Martin Dust wrote: > >> >> On 8 Nov 2007, at 11:24, Odeluga, Ken wrote: >> >>> But what about the 'garagey' trimmings of the latest Burial offering >>> then ...? >>> >> >> Not feeling it at all Ken and it's not getting much play in the >> studio >> at all, to my ears, it just sounds really old and a step backwards into >> a sound that Dubstep was trying to move away from but it seems to have >> fallen into a trap of it's own making. >> >> I much prefer Scorn over Burial... >> >> m >> > >
