Certainly, I'll post it here. I came here because I know people have strong opinions about this and those are ideally what I'd like to hear...the best reasons and the best arguments...and a wide range of them.
On 05/02/2008, Ronan Fitzgerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 05/02/2008, Odeluga, Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Interesting questions Ronan. > > > > Some would argue that it'd only be fair, given that you'd mined the list > > as a resource, that you came back and post up a URL with your article > > when it's finished. > > > > Just a thought :) > > > > Ken > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ronan Fitzgerald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 05 February 2008 14:59 > > To: 313@hyperreal.org > > Subject: (313) Questions for anyone running a vinyl only label > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'm wondering if any of you guys who are involved in running vinyl only > > labels would be interested in a discussion about why you do this and > > what the advantages are. I'm currently writing an article about this and > > it'd be good to have some input if you do run a label that's vinyl only. > > What I'd be interested to hear is as follows, and this is directed at > > any individual running a vinyl only label: > > > > Why do you choose for your label to release only vinyl? Is it love for > > vinyl, or dislike for digital? What do you feel it achieves? Will you > > ever release music digitally? > > > > Do you worry about people who like your music who might want to buy it > > digitally being alienated by this? > > > > Would you release your music digitally if you thought it would open up a > > new fanbase for you? Surely more people liking good music is best, > > whatever format it's on? > > > > It'd be really interesting to hear your thoughts, > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ronan > > > >