Certainly, I'll post it here.  I came here because I know people have
strong opinions about this and those are ideally what I'd like to
hear...the best reasons and the best arguments...and a wide range of
them.

On 05/02/2008, Ronan Fitzgerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 05/02/2008, Odeluga, Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  Interesting questions Ronan.
> >
> > Some would argue that it'd only be fair, given that you'd mined the list
> > as a resource, that you came back and post up a URL with your article
> > when it's finished.
> >
> >  Just a thought :)
> >
> > Ken
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ronan Fitzgerald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 05 February 2008 14:59
> > To: 313@hyperreal.org
> >  Subject: (313) Questions for anyone running a vinyl only label
> >
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm wondering if any of you guys who are involved in running vinyl only
> > labels would be interested in a discussion about why you do this and
> >  what the advantages are. I'm currently writing an article about this and
> > it'd be good to have some input if you do run a label that's vinyl only.
> > What I'd be interested to hear is as follows, and this is directed at
> >  any individual running a vinyl only label:
> >
> > Why do you choose for your label to release only vinyl? Is it love for
> > vinyl, or dislike for digital? What do you feel it achieves? Will you
> > ever release music digitally?
> >
> > Do you worry about people who like your music who might want to buy it
> > digitally being alienated by this?
> >
> > Would you release your music digitally if you thought it would open up a
> > new fanbase for you? Surely more people liking good music is best,
> >  whatever format it's on?
> >
> > It'd be really interesting to hear your thoughts,
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ronan
> >
>
>

Reply via email to