On 03.04.2014 21:13, Noriko Hosoi wrote: > Hello, > > (I'm switching from 389-users to 389-devel list for people who could be > more interested in...) > > Rich Megginson wrote: >> On 04/03/2014 07:06 AM, Timo Aaltonen wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> It's me again :) >>> >>> 1) 389-ds-console 1.2.7 has no tarball though it was tagged for release >>> in Sep'12 > You can download the tar ball from here now. > http://port389.org/sources/389-ds-console-1.2.7.tar.bz2
Cool, thanks. It's a broken tarball though, you forgot '/' after the version.. Also, you still need some way to fix the process of how these links get to the webpage too :) >>> >>> 2) 389-adminutil 1.1.20 is not tagged in git >> >> Looks like it is, according to >> https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/adminutil.git/ > Rich, I cannot see the tag, either... *puzzled* > > $ git pull > Already up-to-date. > $ git tag -l | egrep 389-adminutil > 389-adminutil-1.1.10 > 389-adminutil-1.1.11 > 389-adminutil-1.1.12 > 389-adminutil-1.1.13 > 389-adminutil-1.1.14 > 389-adminutil-1.1.15 > 389-adminutil-1.1.16 > 389-adminutil-1.1.17 > 389-adminutil-1.1.18 > 389-adminutil-1.1.19 > 389-adminutil-1.1.8 > 389-adminutil-1.1.9 > > although indeed this page > https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/adminutil.git/ shows it is... > Timo, you could download the zip file/tar ball that has the tag from > here. So, you have no problem to continue your task? I've used the release tarball and packaging is on 9b3cfced24ffe6e6e from master, so I'm good.. just wondered why the tag wasn't there but it was. >>> 3) 389-ds-base repo seems to be in limbo, since 1.3.2 branch doesn't >>> have the latest release, which itself was just 1.3.2.13+ one patch, so >>> doesn't contain changes from .14 and .15. So which one am I supposed to >>> push to the distro? > 389-ds-base-1.3.2.16 is a security fix only release. It's branched from > the stable build (1.3.2.13) and it has only the fix. The tag > 389-ds-base-1.3.2.16 tag is on the 389-ds-base-1.3.2-CVE-2014-0132 > branch. Once we finish more testing, we are going back to the normal > branch 389-ds-base-1.3.2. Sorry about this confusion. ahh ok, I'll just rebase on .16 then. Now I see that you have a separate 389-announce list where only the stable releases get announced.. maybe send those to 389-users too? -- t -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
