On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 00:12 +0100, Michael Ströder wrote:
> On 11/7/18 11:22 PM, William Brown wrote:
> > On Sat, 2018-11-03 at 21:46 +0100, Michael Ströder wrote:
> > > I vaguely remember that 389-DS also implements deref search
> > > control
> > > [1].
> > > 
> > > My question as a client developer:
> > > How does 389-DS deal with reference attributes being absent?
> > 
> > I am assuming that you mean a request for dereference where no
> > attributeList is requested?
> 
> No, I meant the attributes holding the reference are not present in
> the 
> entry.

To be clear that I understand the problem, can you send an example case
of what is occuring? Thanks,

> 
> > Off the top of my head, I do not know, but
> > this is something we should check to see if our behaviour is
> > correct
> > according to the provided RFC. Reading the RFC it doesn't seem to
> > specify how an empty attributeList should be handled, but in my
> > view,
> > it should "do nothing" since no attributes were requested.
> 
> The I-D does not say much about error conditions.
> 
> But I also think if anything's missing the server should simply
> return 
> what's present and can be returned but not error out.
> 
> > > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-masarati-ldap-deref-00
> 
> Ciao, Michael.
> 
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to