Yeah, that's an incredibly good idea. I think it would also be very useful for tables as well - being able to manage metadata for a table without creating a special record has been on my wish list for decades now...
> On Feb 22, 2017, at 7:12 PM, David Adams via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> > wrote: > > The idea is to have an automatic, internal C_OBJECT-type structure (a > dictionary) maintained by 4D for each widget on a form. If they did this, > you wouldn't see anything different on the form, but if you wanted to > associated custom attributes or data with the widget (rules, bindings, > hints, extra lookup data, filters, formats, privileges, etc.), you would > know right where to get/set the data. ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:4d_tech-unsubscr...@lists.4d.com **********************************************************************
