> I don’t have the luxury of installing an SSD RAID.

A 512GB SSD is less than $200
https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-500GB-Internal-MZ-76E500B-AM/dp/B0781Z7Y3S/

or just over if you go for the pro version with the 5 year warranty
https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-512GB-Inch-Internal-MZ-76P512BW/dp/B07836C6YV/





<https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-2-5-Inch-Internal-MZ-75E500B-AM/dp/B00OBRE5UE/ref=sr_1_5?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1524473660&sr=1-5&keywords=512gb+ssd>

Regards,

Wayne


[image: --]
Wayne Stewart
[image: http://]about.me/waynestewart
<http://about.me/waynestewart>


On 23 April 2018 at 15:51, Paul Lovejoy via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com>
wrote:

> Chuck,
>
> You know the old saying: “A watched pot never boils.”
> Watching 4D reload the same table with 7 million records 8 times to
> generate 8 indexes is kind of like that.
>
> I don’t have the luxury of installing an SSD RAID. I’m sure better
> hardware would help.
>
>
>
> Paul
>
>
> > Le 23 avr. 2018 à 04:20, Chuck Miller via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com>
> a écrit :
> >
> > OK I don;t get it. We have a data base of over 200 Gig with many
> millions of records. We run using SSD,s in an Areca RAID. 1 Terabyte SSDs.
> I can tell you that when we restored from a backup up and rebuilt indices
> it took not more than 20 minutes to so. It does not matter if it is by
> table or not. Yes I agree it would be faster by table but with a database
> of this size, you really need to be running on an SSD RAID.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Chuck
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------
> > Chuck Miller Voice: (617) 739-0306
> > Informed Solutions, Inc. Fax: (617) 232-1064
> > mailto:cjmiller<AT SIGN>informed-solutions.com
> > Brookline, MA 02446 USA Registered 4D Developer
> >       Providers of 4D and Sybase connectivity
> >          http://www.informed-solutions.com
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------
> > This message and any attached documents contain information which may be
> confidential, subject to privilege or exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law.  These materials are intended only for the use of the
> intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of this
> transmission, you are hereby notified that any distribution, disclosure,
> printing, copying, storage, modification or the taking of any action in
> reliance upon this transmission is strictly prohibited.  Delivery of this
> message to any person other than the intended recipient shall not
> compromise or waive such confidentiality, privilege or exemption from
> disclosure as to this communication.
> >
> >> On Apr 22, 2018, at 6:40 AM, Arnaud de Montard via 4D_Tech <
> 4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I guess our database of 120gb, running on a 32 bit machine doesn’t
> benefit from this. We were working on the most recent R release and
> yesterday we went to 15.5.
> >>> When reindexing the entire database, 4D Server/4D are still going
> index by index instead of table by table.
> >
> > **********************************************************************
> > 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
> > FAQ:  http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html
> > Archive:  http://lists.4d.com/archives.html
> > Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech
> > Unsub:  mailto:4d_tech-unsubscr...@lists.4d.com
> > **********************************************************************
>
> **********************************************************************
> 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
> FAQ:  http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html
> Archive:  http://lists.4d.com/archives.html
> Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech
> Unsub:  mailto:4d_tech-unsubscr...@lists.4d.com
> **********************************************************************
>
**********************************************************************
4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
FAQ:  http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html
Archive:  http://lists.4d.com/archives.html
Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech
Unsub:  mailto:4d_tech-unsubscr...@lists.4d.com
**********************************************************************

Reply via email to