I can’t think of any reason one would want to go back, either. Splitting the structure into files is something we’ve wanted for _so_ long and opens so many opportunities.
-- Cannon.Smith Synergy Farm Solutions Inc. Aetna, AB Canada <can...@synergyfarmsolutions.com> <www.synergyfarmsolutions.com> > On Oct 10, 2019, at 4:38 PM, Tim Nevels via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> > wrote: > >> Yes, you're correct, currently the move from binary to Project format is one >> way, whether this will become bi-directional I don't know. It is still >> possible to compile back to a single binary though so the step to go from >> Project to interpreted structure binary should surely be possible?? > > This was asked to JPR at the last 4D World Tour show and his response was > “why would you want to do that?” And then he proceeded to explain that to > implement a feature like that would require many hours of engineering time, > and QA time and then it would have to be maintained into the future. > > So he said are no plans for a “project folder back to a single .4DB file” > feature. Only way to have the happen is to convince 4D it is a needed and > necessary feature. ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:4d_tech-unsubscr...@lists.4d.com **********************************************************************
