Grammostola Rosea wrote: > Daniel James wrote: > >> Hi Rosea, >> >> >>> Will ardourvst hit 64studio? >>> >> I'm not sure for the 3.0 release, there are WINE issues to consider. I >> know people are excited about the VST support but I also think it's >> critical to support LV2 as a true Free Software standard for plugins. >> >> > I agree with you. I suggest to install ardour2 as default and make it > possible to install ardourvst next to it. > LV2 is much better for Linux Audio imo, but if people can use VST on > Linux, people start using GNU/Linux more often and maybe will adopt LV2 > too. At the end you got more people using and contributing to LV2... > > > BTW this also suggest that 64studio should support LV2 as good as possible. Cause if you want people to use LV2 instead of VST, you should try to offer them the best LV2 experience as possible! You have to offer good alternatives to VST!
\r _______________________________________________ 64studio-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel
