-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ralf Mardorf wrote:
| pw.marcus wrote:
|> Yes, of course I'm concerned, but I have the feeling that on a
|> "single-core" system, irqbalance is useless, isn't it ?
|>
~From the man page Descripton:
The  purpose  of  irqbalance  is  distribute hardware interrupts across
processors on a multiprocessor system in order to increase performance.

| Hi Marc :)
|
| it looks like it only mange the allocation for dual and maybe multi-core
| systems. I haven't read the doc until now, maybe it also allocates IRQs
| for single core systems. Even if there is only on core, there might be
| to manage that 2 hardware devices are using the same IRQ, while another
| IRQ is unused.

Since there is only one CPU, it handles all the requests.

| I hope I can spare some time for reading about IRQs.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIY67wwRXgH3rKGfMRAo0cAJ0YhAaF10leYUrqix2sRTBDVvBIiwCgpsXc
j1NxX6IQhcgW5YA7Iy/fEds=
=lMfM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
64studio-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users

Reply via email to