Hi :)

I'm fine with the quality of DAT, 48KHz 16-bit, but I've no experience
with recording using Linux. 44.1KHz 16-bit seems to be not fine while
producing with Linux.

What might be a good quality with less load for the CPU and soundcard?
And how can I convert the mastering to CD quality, resp. master directly
in CD quality?

The card is a TerraTec EWX 24/96 (ICE1712 Envy microchip). The CPU is an
AMD Athlon BE-2350 (2x 2.1GHz) and I have 1GB + 896MB RAM (128MB are
used for the integrated graphics).

I'm using 64 Studio 64-bit and Suse 64-bit. Can it be that the audio
output of some Linux has got different qualities? Definitive Reaper has
a better quality in sound using 64 Studio instead of Suse, but that
might has to do with the emulation and I now only will use Linux
applications and no Reaper any more.

I was thinking of recording in 48KHz 24-bit first, but now I guess it
might be better to record in 48KHz 16-bit.

I'm interested what you will use to produce for CD. I don't think
44.1KHz 16-bit will do "you get what you hear", because even virtual
synth recorded to an audio track in this case will have a lower quality
in sound, than the not recorded virtual synth, so maybe I will run into
trouble when doing the master mix, because some instruments maybe are in
CD quality and other instruments maybe are in a better quality. To do
the final mix I guess it would be better to have a homogenous quality,
even if the mastering will be converted from a better quality to CD. But
I don't know. Okay, I have to do some songs my self to find out what's
the best way for me, but maybe your experiences can be a guideline for me.

Cheers,
Ralf

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
64studio-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users

Reply via email to