> You might like to try Qsampler with some .gig files instead. A mistake on my part ;). I wrote "QSynth", but I meant "QSampler".
"Fluidsynth" is fine for Suse and 64 Studio, but QSampler isn't fine for my upgraded 64 Studio and maybe I need QSampler too, so I have to use Suse or to reinstall 64 Studio. Suse is also a good Linux, but not a good DAW, because there are to many unnecessary "things" running in the background. I would prefer to install 64 Studio 3.0 instead of reinstalling 2.1 ;). I would like to have 64 Studio, but with KDE 3.5.9. Some people from the list are running 64 Studio stable with KDE 3.5.9, but for me there got something wrong, when I did the upgrade. Anyway, my computer seems to be able to work with Linux as a DAW, for the moment I'm fine with the Suse DAW and I know that there is a stable Linux DAW distro called "64 Studio" :). I need holidays from the stress I had with Linux until now and will enjoy to make music, before I'll do something like a new installation. I think 64 Studio 3.0 can be a Linux for all my needs, without the need to upgrade to a Debian testing. I expect that I have to reinstall 2.1 and that 3.0 won't be published this year. The frozen Debian testing should become the stable next month, maybe I get pleasantly surprised by a 64 Studio 3.0 this year. Free: "[...] the main pending problem is that ardour is not testing due to a release critical bug. I plan to work on it as soon as rubberband enters sid [...]" And maybe Free can't work 24 hours a day ;), so I expect 3.0 not this year.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
