Gustin Johnson wrote:
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > I know what 'Numa Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support' does, that's
> > why I disabled it because of it's experimental status. I don't know what
> > 'CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS' does, but I think the name speaks for itself.
> > It's recommended by the kernel wiki for RT configuration, it's
> > recommended by an Ubuntu howto and it's set for Suse's RT but ...
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/boot$ cat config-2.6.21-1-multimedia-amd64 | grep
> > CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS
> > # CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS is not set
>
> > The wiki says that there isn't the need to set it, but it might be good
> > to do it.
>
> Check the LKML archives, I thought I remember some problems with it a
> few versions ago.  I could be mistaken though.  Also there is a lot of
> work going on right now.  The 2.6.26 series had some serious problems,
> so it is not suitable for production work (this is causing a lot of
> grief to the UbuntuStudio guys right now).  Unfortunately there is no
> official 2.6.27 RT patches.  The last kernel I tried with your chipset
> was 2.6.24.  It was better, but still not perfect, so you may still have
> a while to wait.

Hi Gustin :) hi list :)

I had a time out from all this. I only used Firefox for entertainment
and to get some non-computer informations. I needed some distance from
troubles, caused by using Linux with hardware that's not old enough, but
also not too old and especially not expensive enough ;).

I guess it will take the next two days to separate serious mails from
spam mails :( after 12 days without fetching emails. Icedove 'only'
detected 79 junk mails itself. That seems to be only the tip of the
iceberg. While separating them I'll reply mail by mail and e.g. take a
look at the Linux kernel mailing list archive.

I patched the 2.6.24 for my 64 Studio 2.1 default and Suse is running a
2.6.25 realtime kernel, they aren't a help. I need kernels ex 2.6.27 and
newer BIOS updates ;) if it's really the chipset.

Cheers,
Ralf

PS and OT: I also will take a look to the forum, I just read
http://www.64studio.com/node/737 until now. Pages like
www.linuxmusicians.com <http://www.linuxmusicians.com> seems to be not
very helpful for 64 Studio users, because we can't use actual Linux
applications, without making 64 Studio unstable or be fine with
informations from people using newer Jack's. The so called 'other good
linux multimedia distro's' are following another guideline. I know
applications like e.g. Rakarrack from my Suse 11.0, a nice application.
The people in that forum are writing about Rakarrack, Qtracktor etc.,
this is interesting, but to get help for a stable 64 Studio, I would
recommend this list and the 64 Studio forums.
I'm running a state of the art Linux, Suse 11.0 and also a more modern
64 Studio, because it's upgraded to Lenny, but I've got good reasons for
trying to get an as far as possible default 64 Studio stable, instead of
Lenny or Suse 11.0.

Oops, I have to go offline again, I just want to report myself back.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
64studio-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users

Reply via email to