-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > I'm wrong. I'm a very fast two finger writer and even for this the > letters are good sorted by QWERTZ, but for 10 finger writers QWERTZ > might be for anatomical reasons better than another system, to sort the > letters. So even nowadays there might be a good reason to have such a > keyboard. Usually this is my argument, why the QWERTZ keyboard isn't an > evidence for morphic resonance. So, we might say, there's still a > technical reason. For typing with 2 fingers I can't make out, if there > is a reason to have the Y and Z changed for English and German. > I have no idea why the he Y and Z are changed for English vs Deutsche speakers. I was referring to the Dvorak layout among one such alternative to the standard QWERTY layout. Supposedly it is a more natural and efficient layout, but backward compatibility with the steam age has meant that we are likely stuck with the QWERTY layout for the foreseeable future. This does not make it the better or more efficient choice, it is merely the layout in use. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJL7XewRXgH3rKGfMRApfvAKCjWw1PlvgOPLUhDdMG1goDG2itxwCcDC0p 9Xc/IBFrH3vL8hl6jMHuqKc= =6hyR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
