Hello Peter The bit is agnostic to which technique, say RPL but also any routing protocol or ND proxy is used in the particular environment.
The bit says I’m a plain host, please ensure reachability for the address I’m registering. The bit is chosen in that direction for backward compatibility with RPL. A plain host that conforms rfc6775 update will always set both the R and T bits. Regards, Pascal > Le 26 févr. 2018 à 09:36, peter van der Stok <stokc...@xs4all.nl> a écrit : > > >> Side question: Is it the right approach or should the leaf set the bit >> instead? > > I don't understand how a node, 6LN, that is not aware of RPL can nevertheless > set a bit related to RPL. > I expect the 6LR to do all handling. > > Or do I misunderstand the context? > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > Roll mailing list > r...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo