On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 21:13 +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2009, at 21:01, JP Vasseur wrote:
>
> > I do not think that the issue is the code size itself but a change
> > in the architecture, thus
> > the reasonable question on whether we could find a simpler approach
> > compatible with
> > 4861 to handle the case of non transitive links that preserves the
> > architecture.
>
> 6LoWPAN-ND is "compatible with 4861".
> (BTW, the "architecture" of IPv6 is in 2460, and we are not optimizing
> that.)
Carsten,
Is this true? Could I have a 6lowpan node that implemented just
standard 4861 that is one ip hop from the edge router that has
implemented 6lowpan ND and have it get back a standard 4861 RA.
Second could I have node that has implemented 6lowpan ND and have it be
able to interact with a router that implements only RFC4861?
If this is true, then this is excellent news.
geoff
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
