Clearly, we have consensus to adopt this document as a working group document.
Authors: please resubmit the draft, with no change other than names, titles and dates, as: draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle-00.txt >From there, this will be developed as a working group document, i.e., we will >have some discussion of each (substantive) change we want to make on the >mailing list and apply them as we reach (rough) consensus. (This is best done >through tickets, as we have been doing for ND for a while now.) We also seem to have a lot of interest in creating other "6LoWPAN on X" type documents. The idea to do much of this in a generic way is interesting, and it wouldn't hurt to have some input on how to do this in the form of individual Internet-Draft submissions. This doesn't mean there should not be such submissions for specific technologies: If you know what needs to be done for a specific MAC/PHY where 6LoWPAN provides significant added value, please do submit an Internet-Draft. Gruesse, Carsten > On Mar 31, 2011, at 19:47, Carsten Bormann wrote: > >> It appears I was a bit quick dismissing BT-LE as a working group item during >> Tuesday's 6LoWPAN meeting. The WG is alive and well, so we can very well >> request the addition of milestones. As the support in the room for working >> on the adaptation of 6LoWPAN for BT-LE was quite good, I'm now issuing a >> call for WG adoption. >> >> This is a call for working group adoption of >> draft-patil-6lowpan-v6over-btle-01.txt >> >> Working group adoption does not mean we agree with every detail of the >> draft, but that we want to use it as the basis of further working group >> work. >> >> Please reply to the list until >> >> Friday, April 8, 23:59 UTC >> >> with your position whether this document should be adopted or not. >> >> Gruesse, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
