OK, I have reread all the messages, and I'm now ready to declare a (rough)
consensus for
Compression Format for IPv6 Datagrams over IEEE 802.15.4-based Networks
(with an ever so slight edge for the -based, which is different from RFC 4944,
but "Datagrams" is different, too).
While there were a number of voices for keeping 6LoWPAN in the title (as in RFC
4919), there did not seem to be consensus for that.
I apologize for holding up this RFC for so long for what is pretty much a
bikeshed color issue.
And, yes, I'm slowly getting back to IETF work, and will try to start popping
the stack.
Gruesse, Carsten
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
