> You do not understand. My observation is not about HC1's insufficiency. > It is about the fact that we agreed that the network we are talking > about is a "IEEE802.15.4-based network" as opposed to an "6LoWPAN".
Pascal: In the WG, we agreed about a title for that document. Not about doing a wholesale replacement of the term "6LoWPAN" in all documents by "IEEE802.15.4-based network". I would expect the outcome for a call for consensus to be different for the latter. In any case, this is not the kind of change to make at AUTH48. There is no emergency caused by the usage. Please indicate to the RFC editor that you agree with publishing the document now. Gruesse, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
