Yes, what I mean this:
I need to change that to say the reference to the first is the source of the
> packet and then the reference for each entry is the previous one when
> uncompressed (not the first as you suggest but, the one just before
> it).
which you are going to say on the draft is correct. Thanks for correcting!
Tengfei
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>
wrote:
>
> Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthub...@cisco.com> wrote:
> > I need to change that to say the reference to the first is the
> source of the
> > packet and then the reference for each entry is the previous one when
> > uncompressed (not the first as you suggest but, the one just before
> > it).
>
> The above paragraph is pretty clear. Use it.
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
6tisch@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
